Revolutionary New Treatment for Skin Cancer

The very first cancer electrotherapy study was published in 1959 in journal 'Science'. In it, two Johns Hopkins scientists reported "total regression" of tumors in 60% of mice. This result was remarkable for an initial study.

Article in 'Science' about effectiveness of Electrotherapy (1959)

Mysteriously, no follow up studies were done.

In 1985, a study in the top journal 'Cancer Research' reported very significant results. Tumors shrank by up to 98% after just 5 hours of gentle electrotherapy over 5 days. This was almost a complete cure.

Article in 'Cancer Research' - high effectiveness of Electrotherapy (1985)

Despite such positive results, further funding was denied. Please see 1995 letter of the lead author to me:

Letter to me of lead scientist of the 1985 study

Together, we applied for a grant from CapCure but were declined.

In 1994, National Cancer Institute found my ideas "very interesting". They referred me to Dr. Chou at the City of Hope Medical Center near LA, who was working with electric currents.

Letter of Response from National Cancer Institute

His colleague Dr. Y. Yen - PhD and MD, who had just moved from Yale -- happened to be working with the enzyme RnR. He fully agreed with my premise. But City of Hope management nixed the collaboration, as the therapy would not bring [moneyed] patients.

Outcome of meeting at City of Hope

Dr. Y. Yen continued to research the enzyme RnR. He has published dozens of papers and emphasizes that inhibiting RnR is an important goal in designing anti-cancer drugs.

Ribonucleotide reductase inhibitors and future drug design

Such chemo drugs have limited effectiveness and high toxicity. Dr. Yen does not mention that the enzyme RnR can be easily disabled by a mild electric current in a non-toxic way.

He recently became president of Taipei Medical University, Taiwan. In May 2016, I sent him my two publications, and implored him to explore and standardize the therapy. He was "glad to know your good progress..." but claimed "I moved to Taiwan and no longer work on this project."

How? In 2016, he published at least two papers on enzyme RnR. The Taipei Medical University has a large "Center for Cancer Research" with 25+ scientists, including Dr. Yun Yen. Do cancer researchers not work on finding better treatments? Otherwise WHAT DO THEY DO?

In 1997, a scientific publication about this new cancer therapy was sent to over 300 cancer institutions worldwide. Only Tata Memorial Hospital in Mumbai, India's top cancer institution, showed interest in exploring this treatment further. See their letter:

1998 Letter of Cooperation of Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India

However, within a year, during the making of a suitable equipment, the hospital lost interest.

In 2010, this treatment effectively treated cancer in two human patients. Tata Memorial Hospital was contacted for the 2nd time. They responded again. (They must be highly praised for this since other cancer institutions of the world kept quiet.) The director of the hospital, Dr. Anil K. D'Cruz, started exchanging emails with me. I answered his various questions. Then suddenly he stopped the communication. I sent 9 emails, he sent 7. These emails can be seen at the link below:

Emails exchanged in 2010 with director of Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai

Obviously, the hospital sees potential in this cancer therapy. However, they are hesitant to take such a major step that would turn the most expensive treatment into the least expensive. No hospital wants its income to go down...

This non-toxic cancer treatment should work for all cancers since malignant cells in any tissue need to synthesize DNA to grow. At molecular level, cancer is a single disease!

We offer our GEIPE device for visible or palpable cancers only because these can be treated at home without help from a medical professional. Otherwise, the principle of GEIPE treatment (use of gentle electricity) is universally applicable, as shown by the following examples.

●► Two news items from mid-2022 about treating prostate cancer provide validation:

From the OregonLive in USA:
Surgical innovation uses electrical pulses to beat prostate cancer, technique called 'game-changer'

From the Telegraph in UK:
One-hour operation could cure prostate cancer by destroying tumours with electric currents

●► Already in use to treat brain and spinal cord tumors:

See this link in Nature journal:
FDA Approves New Electrical Fields Device for Brain Tumor Treatment

And, this link at cancer.org
Alternating Electric Field Therapy for Adult Brain & Spinal Cord Tumors

●► Proven effective for leukemia using The Kanzius Machine:

The esteemed newsmagazine "60 Minutes" of CBS has broadcast two episodes on The Kanzius Machine for treating cancer.

Apr. 2008 - 1st "60 Minutes" Episode on Kanzius Machine

Oct. 2009 - 2nd "60 Minutes" Episode on Kanzius Machine

A radio engineer named John Kanzius, who had leukemia, built a machine that uses radio waves to produce a stream of electrons (RF current). This is shown by a fluorescent tube lighting up when placed in the path. When they first looked at the machine, he and Dr. S. Curley from MD Anderson Cancer Center thought it could do something amazing. They thought its RF current could heat metal nanoparticles in cancer. They hoped this would cook and destroy the tumor.

However, out of desperation, Mr. Kanzius began treating himself with only RF current, no metal. Surprisingly, his leukemia started to go away. (Unbeknownst to him, most likely he was blocking the enzyme RnR thereby destroying cancer.) Mr. Kanzius was almost completely healed but unfortunately, he was made to go thru an intense chemo regime. The toxicity of the drug, according to Dr. Curley, killed him.

Dr. S. Curley continued studying the Kanzius machine. After a few years, he found it could heal without any extra agent like metal nanoparticles. But that machine is NOT available to any cancer patient! A private company now owns it and has taken it off the market, for reasons you can guess.

Luckily, RF currents can be produced at multiple radio frequencies, including in CB radio range. Thus cancer patients can benefit from this protocol of GEIPE therapy once parameters are standardized.

Dr. James Watson, a leader in molecular biology, is co-discoverer of the double-helix model of DNA. He spent 40 years researching cancer genetics. On May 12, 2016 in New York Times, he stated:

Locating the genes that cause cancer has been "remarkably unhelpful"... If he were going into cancer research today, he would study biochemistry rather than molecular biology. [highlights added]

• All transformations in a biological cell are mediated by one or more enzymes.
• The most important enzyme for cell growth is Ribonucleotide Reductase (RnR). It controls the key step in DNA synthesis. (Various cancer chemo drugs aim to block this enzyme, but with only partial success and much attendant toxicity.)
• This GEIPE therapy disables RnR by biophysical means. It is a non-toxic treatment with high degree of efficacy in both animals and humans.
• There is considerable evidence that cancer is initiated at the active-site of the enzyme RnR. (Dr. Y Yen certainly thinks so.) Thus by targeting this enzyme, we may be nipping cancer in the bud. Please see the published article on this subject:
  "Biochemistry – Not Oncogenes – May Demystify and Defeat Cancer" (2023)

We provide our device for cancers that are on or close to the skin surface. These are cancers that can be seen or felt. We also cover prostate cancer because it can be felt from urologist's way of probing. All of these can be non-surgically treated at home. Sometimes, you may need some initial supervision, which is provided over the internet.

The device can treat all types of skin cancers: basal cell, squamous cell, Merkle cell, melanoma, or Kaposi sarcoma. This scientific treatment is:

• Effective
• Non-toxic
• Non-invasive, non-surgical (using surface electrodes)
• Very Affordable; in fact, too low-cost to be offered by oncologists

It's fair to say it's the best skin cancer treatment around, much better than Mohs surgery or IG-SRT. Though entirely scientific, this treatment may be called holistic, complimentary, natural or alternative. As an exception, here too good is true! Please reach us from contact us page.