Information - best new cancer treatments - bladder, brain, breast, cervical, colon, endometrial, kidney, liver, lung, ovarian, pancreatic, prostate, stomach tumors

A Very Promising but Ignored Cancer Treatment

New Cancer Treatments Alternative

     

GEIPE Home

 

GEIPE -
In A Nutshell

 

Scientific Articles

 

Testimonials & Correspondences
 

The Struggle
 

An Alternative Treatment
 

Cancer Cure?

Cancer & Genes
 

About Us


Contact Us
 

 

Entirely Scientific
Entirely Scientific
Entirely Scientific
Entirely Scientific
Entirely Scientific

Successful alternative cancer treatment options

Non-toxic
Non-toxic
Non-toxic
Non-toxic
Non-toxic

GEIPE Cancer
Treatment

Non/Semi-Invasive
Non/Semi-Invasive
Non/Semi-Invasive
Non/Semi-Invasive
Non/Semi-Invasive

 

Highly Effective
Highly Effective
Highly Effective
Highly Effective
Highly Effective
against various cancers▼

Best treatment - bladder, brain, breast, cervical, colon, endometrial, kidney, liver, ovarian, pancreatic, stomach cancers

GEIPE: Gentle Electrotherapy to Inhibit Pivotal Enzyme (Ribonucleotide Reductase)

Basis & Nature of the Treatment

 

IN A NUTSHELL

 

     Published Scientific Articles               Testimonials & Correspondences

Why is GEIPE
therapy not yet
established?

 The Struggle

How GEIPE Therapy may be standardized & established?

Links directory

Novel GEIPE Cancer Therapy
The promise and the Struggle - in Brief

This non-toxic and effective scientific cancer treatment has been known for more than 20 years but it is not seeing light of the day because it is not patentable and is also very low-cost.

It really is true! Please read on...

This cancer therapy is based on blocking the most critical enzyme in uncontrolled cell growth, Ribonucleotide Reductase (RR), which converts building blocks of RNA into DNA. Table #1. The free-radical (lone electron) at the active-site of enzyme RR can be quenched (paired-up) by a stream of electrons or low-level electric current. Thus gentle electrotherapy would disable enzyme RR and arrest cancer growth. Alas, this therapy would cripple the cash flow of cancer institutions; hence they won't touch it!

My two scientific publications, in 1997 and 2014, describe the theoretical basis of this (GEIPE) cancer treatment along with ample supporting experimental evidence, with both animals and humans:
GEIPE cancer treatment - 1997 Scientific Publication
GEIPE cancer treatment - 2014 Scientific Publication

Top research institutions like National Cancer Institute and MD Anderson Cancer Center have acknowledged the validity of this approach to treat cancer. See:
Letter of Response from MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (June 1994)

It stated: "...the [electrotherapy] information are interesting and deserving of further investigation." ..."We will keep the material on file should opportunities arise to study the effects of electric currents on regression of tumors."

That "opportunity" has not come in more than 20 years, though funds needed to explore electrotherapy would be miniscule. (I have written to hundreds of cancer institutions around the world; MD Anderson Cancer Center was one of the very few that responded.) Self-preservation! Chemo and radiation oncologists don't want to lose their jobs, do they?

This cancer therapy should be applicable to all cancers since malignant cells in any tissue need to synthesize their DNA to grow. At molecular level, cancer is a single disease!

*

MORE INFORMATION, Part 1 of 2:

The very first cancer electrotherapy study was published in 1959 in journal 'Science'. In it, two Johns Hopkins scientists reported "total regression" of tumor in 60% of mice, which was highly remarkable for a maiden study.
Article in 'Science' about effectiveness of Electrotherapy (1959)
Mysteriously, no follow up studies were done.

In 1985, a study published in preeminent journal 'Cancer Research' reported up to 98% tumor-shrinkage - virtual cure - after only 5 hours of gentle electrotherapy over 5 days.
Article in 'Cancer Research' - further effectiveness of Electrotherapy (1985)
Despite such positive results, further funding was denied. Please see 1995 letter of the lead author to me:
Letter to me of lead scientist of the 1985 study
Together, we applied for a grant from CapCure but were declined.


MORE INFORMATION, Part 2 of 2:

In 1994, National Cancer Institute found my ideas "very interesting" and referred me to Dr. Chou of City of Hope Medical Center (near LA) who was working with electric currents.
Letter of Response from National Cancer Institute
His colleague Dr. Y. Yen - PhD and MD, who had just moved from Yale -- happened to be working with enzyme RR. He fully agreed with my premise.
But City of Hope management nixed the collaboration, as the therapy would not bring [moneyed] patients.
Outcome of meeting at City of Hope

Dr. Y. Yen continued to work on enzyme RR, publishing dozens of papers -- and touting its inhibition an important objective in anti-cancer chemotherapeutic drug design.
Ribonucleotide reductase inhibitors and future drug design
Such chemo drugs have limited effectiveness and high toxicity. Dr. Yen DOES NOT MENTION that the enzyme RR can be easily disabled - in non-toxic manner - by mild electric current.

He recently became president of Taipei Medical University, Taiwan. In May 2016, I sent him my two publications, and implored him to explore and standardize the therapy. He was "glad to know your good progress..." but claimed "I moved to Taiwan and no longer work on this project." How? In 2016, he published at least two papers on enzyme RR. The Taipei Medical University has a large "Center for Cancer Research" with 25+ scientists, including Dr. Yun Yen. Do cancer researchers not work on finding better treatments? Otherwise WHAT DO THEY DO?

*


EVEN MORE INFORMATION:

The esteemed newsmagazine "60 Minutes" of CBS has broadcast two episodes on The Kanzius Machine for treating cancer.
Apr. 2008 - 1st "60 Minutes" Episode on Kanzius Machine
Oct. 2009 - 2nd "60 Minutes" Episode on Kanzius Machine

A radio engineer John Kanzius, suffering from leukemia, built a machine that uses radio waves to produce a stream of electrons (RF current) as indicated by lighting-up of a florescent tube put in the path. Both he and Dr. S. Curley of MD Anderson Cancer Center initially thought that RF current/energy of the machine would heat metal nanoparticle embedded in cancer, and thus cook/destroy tumor.

However, in desperation, Mr. Kanzius started treating himself with just RF current, without any metal; lo and behold, his leukemia started receding. (Unbeknownst to him, most likely he was blocking enzyme RR thereby destroying cancer.) Mr. Kanzius was almost completely healed but unfortunately, he was made to go thru an intense chemo regime. The toxicity of the drug, according to Dr. Curley, killed him.

Dr. S. Curley kept doing studies with Kanzius machine, and after a few years, concluded that it does heal without any extra agent like metal nanoparticle. But that machine is NOT available to any cancer patient! A private company now owns it and has taken it off the market, for reasons you can guess.

Luckily, RF currents can be produced at multiple radio frequencies, including in CB radio range. Thus cancer patients can benefit from this protocol of GEIPE therapy once parameters are standardized.
*


Finally, why this is the MOST SCIENTIFIC cancer treatment:

On May 12, 2016 in New York Times, one of the fathers of molecular biology, James Watson (of Watson-Crick DNA double helix fame) who spent 3 decades exploring genetic aspects of cancer, stated:

Locating the genes that cause cancer has been "remarkably unhelpful" - the belief that sequencing your DNA is going to extend your life is "a cruel illusion". If he were going into cancer research today, he would study biochemistry rather than molecular biology.

And according to biochemistry,
  • Whatever takes place in a biological cell is controlled by one or more enzymes.
  • For cell growth, the most critical enzyme is Ribonucleotide Reductase, RR, since it controls the rate-limiting step in DNA synthesis. (Various cancer chemo drugs aim to block this enzyme, but with only partial success and much attendant toxicity.)
  • This GEIPE therapy disables RR by biophysical means. It is a non-toxic treatment with high degree of efficacy in both animals and humans.
  • There is considerable evidence that cancer is initiated at the active-site of enzyme RR. (Dr. Y Yen certainly thinks so.) Thus by targeting this enzyme, we may be nipping cancer in the bud.

******************************** ******************************* ********************************
We need to start a grass-root movement of concerned citizens, cancer patients, journalists and elected representatives who ask cancer institutions why this scientific, non-toxic and effective cancer treatment is not being established? Please use the word of mouth and social media to spread the message.

******************************** ******************************* ********************************

●●● 

NOTE: GEIPE therapy is NOT at all related to the fanciful cancer treatments done with Rife machine or H. Clark's Zapper.

Google    


www cancer-treatment.net

 ©2003 GEIPE - A Very Promising Cancer Treatment
● Los Angeles ● California ● USA